Abstract:
This project will critically consider the intricate
connectivity between the lack of rainfall in the Horn of Africa,
particularly in Somalia and Northern Kenya and ultimately the mass
displacement of people, which has exacerbated the social and political
conflict that already characterizes the region. While the region is
historically known for its fluctuating climate conditions, all evidence
indicates that these circumstances are becoming more severe in recent
decades as a result of the altering global climate. The effects of
regional climate change have ultimately begot a situation of forced
displacement and migration of peoples either to urban centers (climate
change IDPs – internally displaced persons) or across international
boarders (climate change refugees). This profound movement of people is
inciting further conflict in areas already plagued by political
instability and weak governmental control, and has put a severe drain on
limited local resources (both economic and food). These increased nodes
of viable conflict can be seen at multiple levels, with an increase in
communal and clan-based violence in this region to the militarization of
IDP and refugee camps (particularly in Northern Kenyan), which is one
factor that impelled the Kenyan Government to invade Somalia on October
16, 2011 (Zenko, 2011). However, there is no question, that these
increased incidents of conflict (which have the potential of propelling
the two states and perhaps the region into a dire and destabilizing
conflict), have been dramatically exacerbated by the effects of climate
change, and when coupled have created the current regional crisis, which
so far has displaced over a million people (UNHCR, 2011) and has put an
estimated 150,000 to 300,000 (“SOMALIA”, 2011) at risk of starvation.
|
Description
Historical Roots of Conflict:
|
Figure 1 Source: New World Encyclopedia |
The current strife between Kenya and Somalia dates back
to a time before such names were even used to decipher their arbitrary
borders. In fact, resource scarcities and the crippling effects of dry
climates have plagued the nomadic, clan-oriented pastoralist of the Horn
of Africa for hundreds of years. The case of the Somali-Kenyan conflict
dates back to the arbitrary slicing of the African continent, or what
is otherwise referred to as the “1914 scramble for Africa”. It was in
this time period when the British claimed Kenya and Somalia was
fractured into two different colonies. The Northern portion of the
country was sequestered by the British and the Southern (and larger
portion) controlled by the Italians.
Like in many cases in Africa, arbitrary lines sliced
populations leaving clans close to the border with similar backgrounds
and languages. Even today, portion of the Kenyan community in the
Northeastern region maintain their roots as ethnic Somalis (Menkhaus
2005). However, conflict was prevalent in this region even from this
early time, as territories were fought over by among clans and
bloodlines. While clans clashed over territories, they most importantly
fought for the control and access to the limited water, grazing land and
other limited resources in this region. As Bariagaber suggests,
“…'internecine segmentary conflicts' has been a constant feature of
Somali social, economic and political life” (Bariagaber, 2006, p. 31)
and arguably this way of life still represents the tenets on which
conflicts in this part of the world are fought.
Independence to Present-Day Conflict Trends:
However, conflict became truly hardened between Kenya and
Somalia post-independence, with the notions of a “Greater Somalia” and
the interstate conflicts that ensued in the 1960s. Somalia was a unique
case as far as post-independence on the African continent. While most
African nations looked to galvanize unity within their borders after
gaining freedom from the colonial misers, Somalia’s ambitions were of
unifying a population outside of its borders. Somalia’s
post-independence solidarity movement was the country’s attempt to join
the regions held under different colonial rule (including Italian
Somaliland and British Somaliland as well as the Northern portion of
Kenya and Eastern Ethiopia) as a voluntary solidification of Somali
identity. The concept of a “Pan-Somalia” had infiltrated the
post-colonial mentality of the national leaders was therefore infused
into the country’s foreign policy objectives. This policy was seen as a
rejection of the previous colonial borders emanating from profound
political desire for the unification of all the Somalia populations
(including those within in other nation-states such as Kenya, Ethiopia
and Djibouti – at the time still under French control). However, strong
nationalism and the irredentist policy engendered regional conflicts
throughout the 1960s between Somalia and its neighbors, including Kenya.
|
Figure 2 Source: Wikipedia |
From 1960-1964, Somalia waged guerilla attacks, known as
the "shifta wars" (shifta is a pejorative term used today to describe
armed banditry (Menkhaus, 2005)), against Kenya as part of its
Pan-Somalia campaign. However, Somalia suffered bitter defeat in its
scheme for creating a “Greater Somalia” leaving the national psyche
bruised beneath a heavy sentiment of powerlessness (Bariagaber, 2006).
Even worse, this conflict between Somali forces and the Kenyan
population fostered a draconian emergency rule in the North Eastern
province in Kenya, which was not lifted until 1992. It should be noted
that the clan-based violence, described earlier still plagued this
region, and these conflicts were exacerbated by national tensions
between Somalia and Kenya. Moreover, the Kenyan-side of the border is
still referred to by many Kenyans as the "frontier", because it is a
portion of the country with little to know state control or authority in
either the colonial or post-colonial periods. Menkhaus suggests that,
“Thousands of Kenyans have died in periodic communal violence in these
border areas….in clashes that which sometimes produce causalities levels
normally associated with civil wars” (Menkhaus, 2008, p. 28).
Yet, while independence facilitated internal and interstate conflict
between Somalia and its neighbors, this region faced true instability
with the collapse of the Siad Barre regime of Somalia in January 1991,
which had vast implications for not only Somalia and its people, but
also for the Horn of Africa and the entire world. “The failure of the
opposition to fill the power vacuum left behind by Siad Barre after his
flight into exile in 1991marked the beginning of disintegration of
Somalia. Therefore, observers of political development in the region
will realise that armed resistance movements always threaten state
security” (Wasara, 2002). This collapse of governmental structures (with
the flight of Siad Barre after two final attempts to reclaim Mogadishu
from his hold in the South, the former leader died in 1995 in Lagos,
Nigeria) led to a protracted internal conflict, which the nation is
still coping with today and the terming of the country as a “failed
state”. However, this civil conflict has had vast repercussions,
specifically for Somalia’s neighbors including Kenya, who witnessed a
stark and immediate raise in Somali refugees entering the country, which
has only exacerbated the weak and unstable conditions in areas prone to
less governmental control and assistance (particularly in the North
East province). Moreover, this large influx of refugees procured issues
for the Kenyan Government and local communities with regard to the
heightened levels of violence, poverty, lawlessness, terrorism,
environmental degradation, communal and pastoral conflicts, governmental
subversion as well as the general lack of physical capacity to house
all the newly arriving refugees.
|
Figure 3 Source: ReliefWeb |
This massive movement of people into Kenya, particularly from Somalia
can be seen with statistics from the region. At the beginning of 1991,
Kenya had never hosted more than 14,500 refugees at a time – but by
mid-1992, Kenya had become home to nearly 400,000 refugees, mostly from
Somalia, Ethiopia, and Sudan (Odhiambo-Abuya, 2004). Moreover, during
the most contentious periods of conflict, roughly 800,000 Somalis took
refuge in neighboring countries, with about 200,000 fleeing to Kenya.
Now, twenty years after the initial government collapse, conflict in
Somalia continues, as does the flow of Somali refugees into Kenya. More
than 560,000 Somali refugees are estimated to reside in Kenya at present
(Sheikh, 2010). The increase in refugee populations coincided with
several conflicts in the Northeast region of Kenya, predominately in
areas relatively outside of governmental control and close to the Somali
border. Moreover, with weak governmental structures that relinquish
rule of law to the local clans, the area has witnessed an even more
porous border (particularly due the demise of the Somali nation-state),
which has become dramatically militarized, particularly as the illegal
arms trade as utilized this region to galvanize militant recruits and to
move illegal weapons. As violent armed conflicts rage in Kenya’s border
region the Kenyan Human Rights Commission (KHCR) suggests, “That
hundreds of armed criminals can terrorize a town for hours without the
intervention of the country’s security forces is a clear indication that
the government has little or no authority in the North Eastern region”
(Menkhaus, 2005).
The raise in regional conflict at the Somali-Kenyan border areas
began to emerge shortly after the collapse of Barre government; however,
conflict spillover and the lawless nature of the area are not the only
explanations for the eruption of violent confrontations. In fact, other
factors that attribute to the increased violence are: resource
scarcities, the manipulation of ethnic tensions (often times by
political authorities), tribal contentions, livestock raids, influx in
arms, endemic poverty, governmental neglect, corruption and a cultural
of collective culpability (Menkhaus, 2005)). The most notable conflicts
occurred in Northeastern Kenya in the districts of Wajir (1992-1993
& 2000-2001) Isiolo (1980s), Garissa (1998-2000) and Mandera (2004).
However, while these conflicts began to permeate Kenyan communities at
the Somali border with the onslaught of the 1991 collapse it should be
noted that many of these nodes of armed violence emerged from a history
of resource scarcity, tribal tensions, pastoral competition and overall
extreme poverty in the region. USAID suggests, “Many of the worst
instances of armed conflict in the border region occurred in the 1990s
and are now either resolved or at least in a state of suspended
animation.” However, “They provide invaluable clues to conflict drivers
and management for contemporary crises in the region, and in some cases
have contributed to current problems” (Menkhaus, 2005, p. 20).
Present-Day Border Conditions:
|
Figure 4 Source: Long War Journal |
In the wake of the Barre regime, Somalia has had no viable central
government leaving the country’s political vacuum to be filled by
Al-Shabaab* militants. Al-Shabaab controls the Southern region of the
state and the areas around the capital, Mogadishu, leaving much of the
rural areas to fall under the fist of clan warlords. This instability
has left Somalia to fall under the auspicious of a failed state, which
has become a serious liability for most of its neighbors, including
Kenya. “Since 2006, the country has faced an insurgency led by Al
Shabaab, one of Africa’s most fearsome militant Islamist groups. Al
Shabaab controls much of southern Somalia and has claimed affiliation
with Al Qaeda since 2007” (Kron, 2011).
With little to no state authority in Northeastern region (dubbed the
“frontier”) and militants controlling the Southern part of Somalia, this
area has become a hot bed for illegal arms transfers, regional
militarization (particularly in the refugee camps like Dadaab located in
the Garissa District roughly 100 miles from the Somali border), and
violent confrontations. Moreover, this general region has become a safe
haven for terrorist groups, which has exacerbated local pastoral
tensions in the region, particularly with the increased accessibility to
arms.
However, the region around this porous border has also provided an
asylum region for those fleeing the violence and conflict waging in
Somalia. This mass influx of refugees only worsened the tensions in this
region (leading to the aforementioned conflicts), particularly in the
North East Province of Kenya. Moreover, this large movement of peoples
into Kenyan territory forced the Kenyan Government to enforce a de facto
encampment policy in order to house the onslaught of refugees. Camps
such as Dadaab (the largest refugee camp in the world), which houses
three camps, was erected in this region (the Garissa District) and was
originally designed to accommodate 90,000 refugees (Provost &
Mohamed 2011). However, since June, 26, 2011, Dadaab houses 367,855
refugees, four times the intended population, (UNHCR Dadaab Camp, 2011)
and the expected numbers are only going to claim reaching an estimated
450,000 by the end of 2011 (Fleeing Somalis Struggle, 2011).
|
Figure 5 Source: OCHA |
However, as conditions of political instability and lawlessness
clearly define this border region (and the Somalia state at large), this
area has also been dramatically impacted by the effects of climate
change, which have not only augmented the levels of violence and the
number of people displaced, it has also escalated the tensions in the
region. The current tensions and violence that have consumed this border
region seem to be most directly correlated with the changing rainfall
patterns in this area. These altering patterns include a much drier and
longer dry season and a shorted and more intense rainy season. These
changes have increased the pressure on the land as there has been an
rise in the desertification of the Northern regions, which is limiting
the herding capacity of the land and forcing many pastoralists to move
southward (Horst, 2006). Moreover, the IPCC’s (Intergovernmental Panel
on Climate Change) projections suggest that by the year 2050, the Horn
of Africa (including Northern Kenya and Somalia) will experience a 10%
decline in rainfall (IPCC, 2011), which will most definitely insight
migration and violence in the region, and further destabilize the
region.
Furthermore, lack of rainfall has starkly exacerbated already
existing tenuous relations in the region, particularly in part due to
vast resource scarcities that have arisen due to the warming climate,
the drying water resources and depressed availability of arable land.
Resource scarcities is a conflict driver in this region and has brought
clans to violent conflict, and has also forced many to flee regions to
due to inability to access livelihoods, particularly those based on
rain-fed crops and access to water resources.
However, this region has been plagued by droughts for centuries, and
this current crisis is not the first experienced by the region. It is
suggested that moderate drought is expected every four to five years in
the Horn and parts of Eastern Africa (Horst, 2006). Yet, the 2011
drought is said to be the worst drought in 60 years (Brown, 2011),
bringing one to think that the origins of the palpable increase in
temperatures has emerged from sources other than the traditional and
routine climate patterns. It is suggested that this increase in
temperatures (that has been gradual over decades) is primarily due to
the effects of a changing global climate, one that was engendered by man
centuries ago.
These drought-like conditions have especially impacted the Somali
community. With little to no state authority in a landscape controlled
by clan warlords as well as the lurking Al-Shabaab militants, food aid
and other forms of assistance to this highly vulnerable population has
been almost non-existent. “As drought ravaged Somalia in 2010 and 2011,
causing a full-blown famine in several parts of the country, the Shabaab
blocked starving people from fleeing the country. The group was widely
blamed for causing the famine by forcing out many Western aid
organizations, depriving drought victims of desperately needed food”
(“Al Shabab”, 2011). Impacted by regional climate change, which is
stripping farmers and pastoralists of their livelihoods, the region is
also suffering from mass migration and dramatic food insecurity, roughly
1,300 people per day cross the Kenya-Somali border in July 2011 (Daily
Nation, 2011).
|
Figure 6 Source: USDA |
On October 17, 2011, the Kenyan Armed Forces invaded Southern Somalia
after attacks on aid workers and foreigners in the Northeastern region
of Kenya. The New York Times reported, “A big battle may be shaping up
in southern Somalia between the Kenyan military, which took the unusual
step of sending hundreds of soldiers into Somalia over the weekend, and
the Shabaab militant group, a ruthless franchise of Al Qaeda that vowed
Monday to attack Kenya in retaliation” (Gettleman, 2011). Moreover,
while the two countries are clearly line up for a bilateral
confrontation that has the potential for long-term entrenched warfare,
the Kenyan military commanders have acknowledged that their main goals
are to push the Somali-terrorist back from the border with Kenya
(Gettleman, 2011). As Kenya and Somalia fall into the next phase of
conflict, full-fledge (bilateral warfare), the prospects for an
improvement in relations and conflict conditions in this region does not
appear promising. As the Sahara desert expands and dryer conditions
reach this region the carrying capacity for the herding lands will
dramatically decrease along with the rainfall, which will further impact
the movement of people as well as their ability to access livelihoods
and food sources. These patterns will continue to fuel conflict and
enhance the powers of the militants and warlords in the region (which
ignited Kenyan troops invasion into Somali territory in the first
place). The decades long idea of this region being a place of “not peace
not war” (Menkhaus, 2005) seems to have dramatically shifted to a place
of not peace, but war. |
Duration
Begin Year: 1991
End Year: ongoing
Duration: Unknown |
Location
Continent: Africa
Region: East Africa
Country: Somalia and Kenya |
Actors
|
Source: Photograph Courtesy of Eddie Tsibulevskiy |
There are a multitude of actors in this conflict including
both sovereign and non-sovereign actors. The Kenyan Government is a main
actor sovereign actor, who has exhibited little strength in maintaining
the border region, but has recently invaded Somali national territory.
Additionally, this conflict engendered many non-sovereign actors working
in the region to either mitigate or exacerbate tensions. These
non-sovereign actors include, Al-Shabaab and clan warlords who have
asphyxiated much of the economic and political capacity in the region
and have exacerbated the conflict and tensions due to their illegal arms
trade and the militarization of pastoralists and refugees communities
in the region. Additionally, pastoralists, farmers and their respective
clans are non-sovereign actors in the region, who have not only
suffered from the dramatic impact of climate change, but have also been
fighting territorial conflicts since before the time of colonial rule.
Moreover, refugees and IDPs have also emerged out of the altering impact
of climate change and the increased violence in the region, as
non-sovereign actors. Finally, one can see the entrance of foreign aid
workers, as well as local assistance programs, prop up in the region due
to the extended conflict and particularly food insecurities. These
non-sovereign actors are particularly important for the future recovery
of the area as they are seeking to abate the conflict and assist those
displaced by both the violent conflict and the impact of the drying
conditions. |
Many projections of climate change in Africa
suggest that the continent will face a warming of .2C to .5C per decade
(Desanker, 2002) and these warming temperatures will engender erratic
rainfall patterns in the region. Eastern African nations, such as Kenya
and Somalia, will face increase in overall temperature. One study
suggests that the mean annual temperature has increased from 1960-2006
by at least 1°C in Kenya and 1.3°C in Ethiopia, and both countries are
experience a higher frequency of hotter days (Oxfam, 2011). While this
region does have a history of draught, IRIN estimates that there have
been 42 droughts since 1980 (IRIN, 2011). However, currently the periods
of drought are becoming longer and more frequent due to the increasing
regional temperatures and the decrease in rainfall. “According to
surveys of local communities, the climate in the Horn is experiencing an
increase in the rates of drought. Reports from the Kenya Food Security
Group and from pastoralist communities show that drought-related shocks
used to occur every ten years, and now are occurring every five years or
less. Borana communities in Ethiopia report that whereas droughts were
recorded every 6-8 years in the past, they now occur every 1-2 years”
(Oxfam, 2011). It is suggested that from Fenruary to July 2011, the
region has experienced rainfall from 2 to 8 inches below normal (Walsh,
2011). These warming climates and lack of rainfall will put a massive
stress on the carrying capacity of the land particularly for famers and
herders, andwill also beget issues of large-scale droughts procuring
dramatic issues of food insecurity for the region.
|
Figure 7 Source: OCHA, Fews Net |
Due to the region’s extreme dependency on natural resources
(such as cattle and crops), the altering of climate patterns have the
capacity to put a huge strain on existing resources, particularly with
regards to food sources. Studies suggest that the increase in number and
severity of droughts in Somalia have cut production of their national
consumption needs (IRIN, 2011). Moreover, this increase in regional
temperature and decrease in overall rainfall will further cause
desertification of the land, which will decrease its carrying capacity
and force populations (particularly farmers and pastoralists) to
continue to move southward. It is estimated that by 2080, the proportion
of arid and semi-arid lands in Africa will likely increase by 5 to 8%
(Boko et all, 2007). A recent study suggests that there will be a
drastic decrease in the “long rains” (from March to June) from 1980 to
2009 (Oxfam, 2011), which will continue to dry out the land and in
ability for framers and herders to participate in their traditional
livelihoods.
Additionally, this increased pressure on the land will
create even more severe food scarcities in the region, due to the
inability to grow traditional crops combined with the slow nature or
potential inability of the populations in this region to adapt their
food production to meet the altering environment (Boko et all, 2007). A
report for the IPCC suggests that the length of the growing season will
be reduced, for some countries by as much as 50% by 2020, which could
lead in a drop of crop net revenues by up to 90% by 2100, which would
predominately effect small scale farmers (Boko et all, 2007). It is
predicted that Eastern Africa may lose up to 20% of the growing period
of key crops by the end of this century (Oxfam, 2011). This is
particularly worrisome in countries, such as Somalia, Kenya and other
nations in the Horn of Africa who are extremely dependent upon rain-fed
crops such as: corn, wheat, teff, sorghum and beans as their staple
source of food and income. It has been suggested that in Somalia and
Northern Kenya, where food and income generation are already extremely
limited, this changing nature of farming and land use could spiral into a
devastating humanitarian crisis. “The United Kingdom's Division for
International Development projects that crop yields of rice, maize, and
wheat will fall up to 10 percent in Somalia and across the Sahel region
by 2030” (Stimson Center, 2011). Moreover, reports from Oxfam suggest
that by the end of this century the capacity to grow beans (one of the
major crops and staple foods) will decrease by 50% in the East African
region (Oxfam, 2011).
|
Source: Photograph Courtesy of Eddie Tsibulevskiy |
The stifling of crop production in this region has fostered
and will continue to generate situations of dire famine. “Nancy
Linborg, an official with the U.S. Agency for International Development
(USAID), told a Congressional committee that more than 29,000 children
under the age of 5 had died over the past three months in Somalia,
thanks to the famine. If conditions worsen—and there's little reason to
expected that they won't— upwards of 800,000 may die of hunger and other
causes” (Walsh, 2011). Moreover, as previously mentioned famine-like
conditions in Southern Somalia has forced populations across national
borders, creating dire conditions of hunger and extreme poverty,
particularly in the Garissa District of North East Kenya, home to Dadaab
refugee camp.
The current drought clearly connects to the severe drying
conditions created by the La Niña phenomenon**, which lasted from June
of last year to this May in the Pacific Ocean (Walsh, 2011). However,
in 2007 the IPCC suggested the Eastern African region may in the future
experience more intense rainfall as a product of the El Niño phenomenon,
which will have the capacity to erode much of the land.El Niño has
been accused of carrying more sporadic and dramatic rainfall patterns to
the region. This has made the monsoon season irregular and often far
more intense procuring large-scale floods, massive destruction of
infrastructure as well as modifying the planting season (Walsh, 2011). |
Type of Environmental Problem
Climate Change |
Type of Habitat
Semi-arid pastoral region |
Type of Conflict
Internal conflict (Somali Civil Conflict)
Interstate Conflict: Somalia and Kenya
While it can be argued that the root of this conflict falls
under the auspicious of an internal conflict in the form of the Somali
civil conflict, it can also be considered an interstate conflict, which
was illuminated by the October 2011 Kenyan invasion of Southern Somalia.
Moreover, while the source of this interstate confrontation can most
notably be attributed to conflict spillover from the Somali civil war
this confrontation has further exacerbated the aforementioned underlying
territorial tensions between semi-nomadic pastoralists in Northern
Kenya and Southern Somalia as well as by the changing climate. The
multiple nodes of conflict highlight the crisis in the Horn and have
drastically impacted regional tensions that date back to before
colonization. |
Level of Conflict
When considering the interstate conflict between Somalia
and Kenya, there has been chronic instability in this region (Northern
Kenya and Southern Somalia), which steams from larger state issues such
as resource scarcities, lack of viable infrastructure or political
control and endemic poverty in the region. However, when considering the
trigger of the Kenyan-Somali conflict, the regional conflict spillover
seems most aptly at the root of the Kenyan authorities decision to
invade the Southern Somali region. The key triggers therefore would be
directly correlated with the Somali civil conflict and the lack of
tangible stability in the country. The specific trigger points can most
likely be identified as:
- Political
- Infrastructure
- Civil
These trigger effects lie at the origins of the bilateral
conflict, and therefore assist in the assessment that this conflict
would be considered a high level.
|
Fatality Level of Dispute (Military & Civilian Fatalities)
High
|
Source: personal photograph of Sarah Cechvala |
Death tolls in the region based on the famine alone have
reached 300,000 and when combined with estimates on conflict-related
deaths, could total upwards of a half million people.
Estimates range dramatically in number of casualities of
this conflict. This is primarily due to the intricate nature of the
conflict as well as its dire implications. Additionally, the lack of a
viable central authority in Somalia (since the dimise of the Siad
Government and the inability of aid workers and foreign authorities to
enter the region) has made hard numbers virtually non-existant. However,
some have projected that the the Somali civil conflict has procured a
death toll of roughly 550,000 people from the year 1991 to 2004
(Scaruffi, 2009).
This figure however, does not include the vast numbers of
innocent people who have lost their lives to worsening famines. Some
sources suggest that in past years famines have claimed numbers reaching
300,000 people (Berry, 1991). Most interestingly, prior to the current
drought and subsequent famine the worse recorded cause of famine for the
Somali nation was in the early 1990s, correlating with the collapse of
the Siad Government and complete chaos that enveloped the country
afterward.
Current estimates place death tolls in the stratosphere
when compared to past spouts of regional famine. Classified as the worst
drought in 60 years, some reports indicate that over 29,000 Somali
children under the age of 5 have perished and roughly 640,000 children
are acutely malnurished (Nor and Straziuso, 2011). Moreover some
statistics estimate that 3.7 million Somalis are living in crisis and
2.8 million of those are living near the southern border with Kenya and
Ethiopia. Moreover, as many as 750,000 Somalis could die in the upcoming
months due to extreme drought and famine conditions, none the likes of
which this region has experienced. (World Vision 2011).
Finally, while the combat death toll has remained steady
particularly between clan conflict and Al-Shabaab militants, and the
number of civilians losing their lives daily to starvation has jumped
dramatically forcing a mass exudous of people. Most specifically those
fleeing Somalia and entering Kenya's refugee camps. Dadaab, which has
witnessed up to 3,500 peoples per day seeking refuge (Care, 2011). |
Since this conflict has roots
in civil conflict, but is truly examining the interstate confrontation,
it seemed essential to consider the overlap both locally in the context
of the Somali civil conflict and then bilaterally, which will look at
the overlap in environment and conflict in the Kenyan Somali conflict
context.
Environment-Conflict Link & Dynamics
Somali Civil ConflictThe causal loop below demonstrates the
intricate correlation between the current conflict in Somalia and
changing climate that is dramatically affecting the region. The diagram
is siphoned into three different, but highly interconnected sections:
the effects of climate change on the earth, the effects of climate
change on humans in relation to migration, political stability and
livelihood and finally the effect of climate change on human conflict.
Below describes the relationship between these moving components that
are clearly not mutually exclusive.
- Climate Change & Environment in Somalia
Climate change is directly affecting the weather patterns in this
region, which has had direct implications on the rainfall. This change
in weather fosters a positive and negative relationship with the environment (i.e. generating a more dramatic raining season as well as a much more dire dry season).
- This project is going to closely examine the dry season, which
due to climate change is becoming a longer and drier period (negative
correlation).
- This increased severity and occurrence of conditions for drought
is affecting the amount of arable land (negative correlation) that is
available to farmers and pastoralists as a mean for livelihood (negative
correlation). This inability to participate in the local economy
because of draught extends into the next portion of the causal loop
diagram, which explores the influence climate change has on humans.
- Climate Change & Environment in Somalia
As climate change alters environmental conditions it engenders a
large impact on humans, which transpires through multiple vehicles. This
causal loop examines the overall impact of climate change on human
conflict in Somalia and specifically considers the social implications
as well as the migratory issues that arise due to climate change.
- As the amount of arable land becomes drastically diminished
due to the lack of rainfall, farmers (who grow rain-fed crops like maize
and wheat) as well as pastoralist (who hold a predominate role in
Somali culture) lose their means to livelihood (positive correlation).
- This increased severity and occurrence of conditions for drought
is affecting the amount of arable land (negative correlation) that is
available to farmers and pastoralists as a mean for livelihood (negative
correlation). This inability to participate in the local economy
because of draught extends into the next portion of the causal loop
diagram, which explores the influence climate change has on humans.
- When conditions exist that do not permit the farmer to farm or the
herder to maintain his livestock, famine is oftentimes the outcome (negative correlation).
For example, if wheat farmers in southern Somalia can no longer grow
their crops this not only generates dire repercussion for their
families, specifically in their personal loss of livelihood, but also
has a societal impact, as food security becomes a glaring issue of
national concern (positive correlation). With less food, there is a heavier competition among people in rural as well as urban settings over this basic resource.
- However, in a country such as Somalia where there is no stable
governmental structure, this diminished ability to access food for the
local populations further augments the lack of political stability faced
by the country (negative correlation). Political instability
is further created as the farmers and herders become upset with their
conditions and the lack of assistance received from the government (negative correlation).
For example, these conditions could force the farmer to take up arms
against Al-Shabaab or join the militia due to lack of another viable
option to support his family.
- This loss of livelihood, faced by farmers, herders and those who
depended upon their crops and livestock, forces large-scale migration
from rural areas to urban settings in search of employment, food and
better living conditions (negative correlation). However, urban resources are already heavily burdened by the lack of economic activity and food scarcity (positive correlation), so the mass influx of unskilled laborers moving into urban centers exacerbates an already contentious situation (negative correlation).
Therefore, the farmer cannot find work and continues to be unable to
support his family, which generates anger among the general population
and influences the overall instability in the country.
- Climate Change & Violent Conflict
Finally, this causal loops considers the implications that this
dramatic loss of livelihood and extreme circumstances of poverty has on
social conditions. Often times, this lack economic productivity and
endemic poverty translates into violent conflict. In the case of
Somalia, with its already vulnerable and flimsy political and governing
structure, conditions of famine and mass migration beget a much more
violent and unstable climate.
- A decline in the accessibility to livelihoods will
dramatically increase people’s frustrations with the political system,
those in power and perhaps even within communities, which will increase
the overall violent conflict in a country (negative correlation).
For example, in Somalia, the government’s isolation policy, which has
shut off international food aid, created violence between communities,
citizens and Al-Shabaab due the desperate need for food resources
- Moreover, with these altering social and migratory conditions,
the country finds itself in a vacuum of political instability, which
increases the climate for conflict (negative correlation).
- As concerns surrounding food security begin to raise this will create more situations of violent conflict (negative correlation). Furthermore, fewer overall resources in an area, particularly an urban setting will increase occurrences of violent conflict (negative correlation).
While this causal loop examines the interaction between the
different moving parts linked to draught, famine, migration and
conflict in Somalia, there is also a profound systems behavior that is
occurring. In the case of Somalia, there is already an underlying
condition of endemic poverty that is an integral component of the system
and underpins many of the already existing facets, such as government
instability, lack of resources and livelihood. This is essential when
examining the causal loop because with this ever-increasing statistic
regarding overall poverty generates conditions for more violent
conflict, which compounds the situation of draught and
migration.Bilateral Interstate (Somali-Kenyan) Conflict
This causal loop demonstrates the dynamics between to the
events that are occuring in Somalia (particularly as seen with the
Somali civil conflict) and how these interactions are impacting their
neighbor (Kenya), and to this end are inciting the Kenyan Somali
conflict. |
Level of Strategic Interest
State
Bilateral |
Dispute Outcome
In Progress |
Relevant Websites and Literature
"Al Shabab." Times Topics - The New York Times. 17 Oct. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. <http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/s/al-shabab/index.html>. Daily Nation (Nairobi), "Aid crisis as Somali (accessed June 29, 2011).
Bariagaber, Assefaw. Conflict and the Refugee Experience. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006. Print.
Berry, LaVerle. "Ethiopia - Ethiopia in Crisis: Famine and Its Aftermath,1984-88." Country Studies. Ed. Thomas P. Ofcansky. Library of Congress, 1991. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. <http://countrystudies.us/ethiopia/35.htm>.
Brown, Ben. "Horn of Africa Tested by Severe Drought." BBC - Homepage. 4 July 2011. Web. 8 Nov. 2011. <http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-14023160>.
Care. ""The Worst Crisis in the World Today" Lives Hang in the Balance." Care. 5 Sept. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. <http://www.care.org/emergency/Horn-of-Africa-food-poverty-crisis-Dadaab-2011/index.asp>.
Desanker, Paul V. Center for African Development Solutions. World
Wildlife Fund. “Impact of Climate Change.”Johannesburg, South
Africa. <www.worldwildlife.org/climate/Publications/WWFBinaryitem4926.pdf>.
"Fleeing Somalis Struggle To Find Shelter At The World's Largest Refugee Camp." Doctors Without Borders. <http://www.doctorswithoutborders.com/news/article.cfm?id=5371&cat=field--news> Web 1 July 2011.
Gettleman, Jeffrey. "Somali Militants Threaten Kenya Over Cross-Border Troops." The New York Times. 17 Oct. 2011. Web. 7 Nov. 2011. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/18/world/africa/somali-militants-vow-to-attack-kenya.html?_r=1>.
Horst, Cindy. Transnational Nomads: How Somalis Cope with Refugee Life in the Dadaab Camps of Kenya. New York: Berghahn, 2006. Print.
IRIN. "HORN OF AFRICA: Fast Facts about the Drought." IRIN • Humanitarian News and Analysis from Africa, Asia and the Middle East - Updated DailIRIN, 5 Aug. 2011. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. <http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=93426>.
"IRIN Africa | SOMALIA: Number of drought-displaced arriving in
Mogadishu "dropping" | Somalia | Early Warning | East African Food
Crisis | Environment | Food Security | Natural Disasters |
Refugees/IDPs." IRIN • humanitarian news and analysis from Africa, Asia and the Middle East - updated daily. N.p., 11 Aug. 2011. Web. 14 Sept. 2011. <http://www.irinnews.org/report.aspx?reportid=93446>.
Kron, Josh. "Somalia." Times Topics - The New York Times. 3 Nov. 2011. Web. 12 Nov. 2011.<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/international/countriesandterritories/somalia/index.html>.
Menkhaus, Ken. Kenya-Somalia Border Conflict Analysis. Publication. Washington, DC: USAID, 31 Aug. 2005. Print.
Menkhaus, Ken. "The Raise of the Mediated State in Northern Kenya: the Wajir Story and Its Implications for State-building." Afrika Focus 21.2 (2008): 23-38. JSTOR. Web. 10 Nov. 2011.
Nor, Mohamed, and Jason Straziuso. "29,000 Somali Children Under 5 Dead In Famine: U.S. Official." The Huffington Post. The Huffington Post, 4 Aug. 2011. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/04/somalia-famine-children-dead_n_917912.html>.
Odhiambo-Abuya, E. "United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and
Status Determination Imtaxaan in Kenya: An Empirical Survey." Journal of African Law 48, no. 2 (2004): 187-206.
Provost, Claire and Hamaz Mohamed. "Dadaab
refugee camps: 20 years of living
in crisis." The Guardian, March 24, 2011. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/global--development/2011/mar/24/dadaab--refugee--camps--living--in--crisis> Web 28 June 2011.
Scaruffi, Piero. "Wars and Casualties of the 20th Century." Piero Scaruffi's Knowledge Base. 2009. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. <http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/massacre.html>.
Sheikh, Abdi . "Somalia clashes kill 138 in two weeks -rights group." Reuters, January 15, 2010. http://madaale.com/?p=145 (accessed June 28, 2011).
Stimson Center. "Climate Change and Famine in Somalia | Spotlight | The Stimson Center | Pragmatic Steps for Global Security." The Stimson Center | Pragmatic Steps for Global Security. Stimson Center, 9 Aug. 2011. Web. 14 Sept. 2011. <http://www.stimson.org/spotlight/climate-change-and-famine-in-somalia/>.
"The Regional Impacts of Climate Change." IPCC - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Web. 12 Nov. 2011. <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/regional/index.php?idp=11>.
UNHCR. "UNHCR - Somalia." UNHCR Welcome. http://www.unhcr.org/pages/49e483ad6.html (accessed September 14, 2011).
UNHCR Dadaab Camp Population Statistics, 26 June 2011.
Walsh, Bryan. "El Nino, La Nina, Climate Change and the Horrific Drought in
Somalia - Ecocentric - TIME.com." Ecocentric - A blog about all things green, from conservation to Capitol Hill - TIME.com. N.p., 4 Aug. 2011. Web. 14 Sept. 2011. <htp://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/08/04/el-nino-la-nina-climate-change-and-the-horrific-drought-in-somalia/>.
Wasara, Samson S. "Conflict and State Security in the Horn of Africa: Militarization of Civilian Groups." Africa Journal of Political Science 7.2 (2002): 39-60. Web. 9 Nov. 2011.
World Vision. "Somali Famine Reaches Historic Level." Sponsor a Child. World VIsion, 22 Sept. 2011. Web. 04 Dec. 2011. <http://www.worldvision.org/home.nsf/home/world-vision-news/famine-in-somalia-2-1426?Open>.
Zenko, Micah. "What's Wrong With Kenya's Invasion of Somalia - Micah Zenko - International - The Atlantic." The Atlantic — News and Analysis on Politics, Business, Culture, Technology, National, International, and Life – TheAtlantic.com. 28 Oct. 2011. Web. 10 Nov. 2011. <http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2011/10/whats-wrong-with-kenyas-invasion-of-somalia/247517/>. |
*The Harakat Shabaab al-Mujahidin
(al-Shabaab)—also known as al-Shabaab, Shabaab, the Youth, Mujahidin
al-Shabaab Movement, Mujahideen Youth Movement, Mujahidin Youth
Movement, and other names and variations—was the militant wing of the
Somali Council of Islamic Courts that took over most of southern Somalia
in the second half of 2006. Although the Somali government and
Ethiopian forces routed the group in a two-week war between December
2006 and January 2007, al-Shabaab––a clan-based insurgent and terrorist
group––has continued its violent insurgency in southern and central
Somalia. The group has exerted temporary and, at times, sustained
control over strategic locations in southern and central Somalia by
recruiting, at times forcibly, regional sub-clans and their militias,
using guerrilla asymmetrical warfare and terrorist tactics against the
Transitional Federal Government (TFG) of Somalia and its allies, African
Union peacekeepers, and nongovernmental aid organizations. For
more info: http://www.nctc.gov/site/groups/al_shabaab.html
**La Niña is characterized by unusually cold ocean
temperatures in the Equatorial Pacific, compared to El Niño, which is
characterized by unusually warm ocean temperatures in the Equatorial
Pacific. To read more about La Niña and El Niño please look at: http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/elnino/la-nina-story.html |
|